By what
astrological “feather” do we “weigh the hearts” of key candidates and determine if they are fit for
the “afterlife” of the U.S. presidency? This practice, illustrated in the
Egyptian Book of the Dead, reveals some important wisdom for today: just as the
ancient subject’s “heart” was required to exactly match the weight of the
“feather of truth,” so today’s aspiring candidates must be able to strike an
incredibly delicate balance between any number of forces. If they don’t get it
right, they are, as the Book says, “eaten by the waiting chimeric devouring
creature Ammit, composed of the deadly crocodile, lion and hippopotamus.” A dramatization, of course, but I
would bet the horrors devised by the ancients have nothing on the pitfalls of
U.S. politics.
The
temptation to predict election outcomes this year is very strong, but again, by
what measure? I’ve examined the charts and the interchart relationships between
top-tier candidates and the election day chart, and between these same candidates
and the U.S. chart, and one thing stands out: every candidate in the field has many key connections with both these charts. The Table below
details the total number of traditional Ptolemaic aspects each candidate enjoys
between his/her natal chart and the other two charts (the orbs I’ve allowed are
noted beneath the chart). Unfortunately, we have no precise birth times for two
major candidates, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, so a number of aspects could be
missing or mistaken.
2016 Election
Interchart
Aspects
|
US Sibly
Interchart
Aspects
|
|
Hillary Clinton
|
56
|
45
(2
w/slightly wide orbs)
|
Ted Cruz
(approximate birth time-some aspects may be missing
or mistaken)
|
45 (2 wide)
|
44
|
Marco Rubio
(noon chart-some aspects may be missing)
|
38
|
42
(1
wide orb)
|
Bernie Sanders
|
68 (1 wide)
|
53
(1
wide orb)
|
Donald Trump
|
67 (1 wide)
|
53
|
Orbs allowed:
Conjunction, Square, Trine, Opposition (±8°); Sextile, Inconjunct
(±4°);
Semi-sextile,
Semi-square (±2°).
If the
number of inter-chart aspects is all we need to predict a winner, Sanders would
have it by a whisker over Trump here. On this day after the Iowa Caucuses,
however, such an outcome seems to be a stretch. Or is it? The trouble is, this
tally begs the question whether it’s the quantity
or the quality of the aspects
involved that tip the scales in favor of one candidate over another. For
instance, a close examination would unearth interesting aspect patterns, such
as three Yod aspects between Bernie Sanders’ natal chart and the Election 2016 chart. Trump and Clinton are contenders in the
interchart T-square contest, but maybe interchart Grand Trines and angular
connections are more important?
There’s
more…how should we weigh the relative importance of cardinal aspects, as
opposed to fixed and mutable ones? Election Day charts are cast for sunrise and
the Sun will always be in mid-Scorpio (U.S. November elections), so the Sun and
AS will always be close: how much do candidate aspects to those points really
matter? For that matter, which points
in the Election and Sibly charts hold the keys to presidential success, and do
hard or soft candidate aspects to those points win the day? How about
concentrations of chart positions in the so-called “power” sectors of the
Zodiac? Bottom line, which magical
combination of factors will match that “feather” on the scale?
The Establishment & Electability
If we
can believe today’s pundits, the salient brew for the highest office will include
equal parts anti-“Establishment” credibility and “Electability”—both intangible
(in the “eye of the beholder”), if not paradoxical qualities. It is the planetary dynamics that underlie
these two qualities that interest me here, however, and for that we need to
think beyond “eye of the beholder” factors into the core realities that drive
today’s political contests. Let’s begin
with the “Establishment.”
Clearly,
some astrological factors register as being more “Establishment”-oriented than
others. Saturn and Jupiter rank high on this list, with their rulership over
Congress and the Judiciary. Importantly,
this duo also co-rules the ideas/intellectual content and the day-to-day
administration of non-political
social institutions that ultimately impact the political process: higher
education, “think tanks,” philanthropic foundations, churches, and so on. Certainly,
elements of the Media are also governed by Saturn and Jupiter (i.e., government
liaisons, public relations reps, etc.), but the conventional rulers of Media
and the technologies involved are Uranus and Mercury.
In fact,
we usually look to Uranus, with its predilection for sudden, surprising change
and liberatory impulses, as being anti-Establishment.
“Freedom of speech”—the foundation for the Media’s watchdog and public
information role in society—is ruled by Uranus, as is shocking “gotcha” type of
journalism and now, the “Internet freedom” that broadens so many horizons.
It’s
important to realize, however, that for Uranus, liberation means breaking away
from whatever the existing power dynamics are, for better or worse—there’s no value judgment being made by this
planetary maverick. Uranus had as much to do historically with the rise of the
Nazi party (and today, with the rise of that party’s ideological descendants)
as it did with the American Revolution. As we know, one person’s “freedom” on
the Internet can mean cyber-stalking or worse for another person. The so-called
Age of Aquarius has both light and dark sides.
Then
there are the 500-lb. gorillas…
Which
brings us to Neptune and Pluto—the ever-present planetary “500 lb. gorillas” in
our political process. Representing the almost primal force of Money, Power and
Illusion-making that circulates throughout our system, these two both fuel and
distort our political process. These planetary power-players trade in our deep,
almost mythic longing for the American Dream and for the “greatness” that seems
so elusive these days—persistent themes in every election cycle. A lot has also
been said this election season about the impact of Wall Street and Big Money in our society and in our campaigns—this speaks directly to Neptune and Pluto
and their behind-the-scenes influence.
Perhaps
the most blatant illustration of this point in recent history is the January
21, 2010 Supreme Court decision on Citizens
United v. Federal Election Commission, which ruled that the First Amendment
guarantees the right of individuals and non-profit corporations to spend
unlimited dollars on political campaigns. Widely considered the result of
high-powered lobbying by the billionaire donor class (the Koch brothers, et
al), this decision not only opened the flood gates of unregulated campaign
donations, but it threatens the very “one-person/one-vote” nature of democratic
politics.
Some
might even say that this development represented a “coup” of sorts, remaking
the nation into an oligarchy. This raises serious questions about what really
constitutes the “Establishment” today. Is it the “Big Spenders” on Capitol
Hill? Or, is it the “Big Spenders” installing
people in offices on that Hill?
Establishment
Heavies at work
Not
surprisingly, a biwheel cast between Citizens
United and Election 2016 suggests that the influence of that decision will
be felt in this election, and that Neptune and Pluto will continue to play the
“heavies” (chart follows):
CU Chiron-Neptune-Jupiter
(Aqu-Pis) conjoin Election Moon, square Election Mercury-AS (Scorpio); Election
Chiron (Pisces) trines Election Mercury. Public sentiment is reflected in the Election Moon
(set for sunrise); in Aquarius, this suggests that the American public will
wake up that day in a feisty, change-oriented mood. Interestingly, this Moon
conjoins the 27°+Aquarius
Moon in the U.S. Sibly chart, so the day promises to recapture the emotional
spirit of 1776. Worth monitoring, the Citizens
United Chiron-Neptune-Jupiter trio may trigger excesses in that Election
Day rebellious spirit; voting irregularities and false returns are more than
likely. The public’s growing wound of mistrust for government (reflected in Election
Chiron trine Election Mercury) will be a persistent theme of the election and
may prove warranted by the time all votes are counted.
CU Neptune is in
mutual reception to CU Uranus; CU Jupiter sextiles CU Pluto (Capricorn); CU
Uranus squares Election Saturn, Venus (Sagittarius), trines Election Mercury. The 7-year mutual reception of
Uranus and Neptune (2003-2010) created a lot of mischief, with Neptunian
“sleight of hand” used to pull off previously unacceptable changes, and Citizens United was a good example of
that. Neptune’s alliance in the CU chart
with the largesse of Jupiter (in Pisces, also disposed by Neptune), combined
with Jupiter’s sextile with CU Pluto (Capricorn) reflects the deep pockets that
promoted this controversial decision and the “opportunity” it represented for
them. CU Jupiter conjoins the Election IC along with the Moon, reflecting these
hidden benefactors.
CU Pluto/Mercury
(midpoint in Capricorn) sextiles Election Neptune (Pisces) and trines Election
Node. The
same deep-pocketed forces who found receptive ears in the Supreme Court are
likely to do their best to sway the American public this election year. Bottom-line
thinking (Mercury in Capricorn) will weigh heavily in people’s votes. The
public will probably feel exhausted with the process by election day.
CU Sun-Venus
(Aquarius) conjoin Election Mars (Capricorn); Election Mars and Pluto
(Capricorn) co-rule Election AS (Scorpio) from 2nd-3rd
houses. A
shocking, unprecedented amount of money (Venus) will circulate during this
election process, making a “bought and sold” election a real possibility. Wall
Street (Mars in Capricorn) will be out in force to aggressively protect their
interests, but the prominence of Mars in this chart could also indicate success
for an older man (Bernie Sanders?).
Election
Saturn/Venus (midpoint in Sagittarius) trines Election Uranus (Aries). Election
Saturn disposes Election Mars and Pluto (Capricorn). Voters will likely be looking for
a new “relationship” with government, and their economic growth and sense of
fair treatment (Venus is disposed by Jupiter in Libra) look to be the stakes. Whether
this translates into a challenge to capitalism itself, as our default system,
is an open question.
CU Mercury-Pluto
(Capricorn) trine Election MC-Node (Virgo). As noted in the last point, the
excesses of capitalism as an economic system are under scrutiny these days—this
powerful Mercury-Pluto combination reflects the billions that have been
channeled into Election “messaging” that supports the status quo. Whether that economic
force can be leveraged to another point-of-view’s advantage remains to be seen.
Pragmatic problem-solving and “getting the job done” (Virgo) will likely win the
day when the messaging is all said and done.
So,
what makes a candidate “electable?”
An issue
for Part II of this discussion, coming soon—electability is an elusive quality
that also has a lot to do with our “heavies”
Neptune and Pluto. Can the candidates defy
these planetary gorillas and win, or must they burn sacrifices on their
respective altars, hoping for a boon? Myth alert—it might get ugly!
Raye Robertson is a practicing astrologer, writer and former university English instructor. A graduate of the Faculty of Astrological Studies (U.K.), Raye focuses on mundane, collective-oriented astrology, with a particular interest in current affairs, culture and media, the astrology of generations, and public concerns such as education and health. Several of her articles on these topics have been featured in The Mountain Astrologer and other publications over the years. Raye can be contacted by comment here, or at: robertsonraye@gmail.com.
© Raye Robertson 2016. All rights reserved.
Very good to hear from you - good luck with your initiative!
ReplyDelete